Thanks for looking 🙂
-
Recent Posts
- Follow Norm 3.0 on WordPress.com
-
Join 2,350 other subscribers
Categories
Archives
Blogs I Follow
- QWF Writes
- An Embarrassment of Riches (Closed)
- WALKIN', WRITIN', WIT & WHIMSY
- Two Cameras - Two Views
- Manja Mexi Mexcessive (closed)
- THE WIDOW BADASS BLOG
- Monday Window
- This 'n That
- joeyfullystated
- Unassorted stories
- Saying nothing in particular
- Shoot 'N Go
- Beyond the Window Box
- Lisa Dorenfest
- O' Canada
- Arl's World
- Me Exploring
- An Evolving Life
- Picture Retirement
- Dreaming Reality
- Capturing Moments
- Leara writes and other creative things...
- Zimmerbitch
- Thoughts of a Wanderer
- Daisy Smiley Face
- Fluidicthought
- A Teacher's Reflections
- ⚡️La Audacia de Aquiles⚡️
- The happy Quitter!
- Katy Trail Creations
- THE SPECTACLED BEAN
- TINA HOME
- Carrie Rubin
- Following A Bold Plan
- thoughts and entanglements
- coronet66
- Nick Watkins
- Old Guy Walking
- Getting the Picture
- Almost Iowa
- pistachio conspiracy #63
- Retirementally Challenged
- Thoughts Of An E'ville Woman
- Travels in the Middle East and beyond
- ITALY PHOTO PROJECT
- Mary J Melange
- Val Right Now
- Locating Frankenstein's Brain
- lita doolan productions
- Life After 50
I’m old-fashioned, I prefer representational art, (although I don’t mind abstract art if there actually is something representational in it that I can figure out) this to me is not art, and I wonder if this piece of non-art was the one purchased by our Canadian government some years ago? I remember something about that in the news back then, if so, then in my humble opinion, it was a colossal waste of taxpayer’s hard earned money.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is indeed the piece you’re thinking of. It was purchased (and is still owned) by the National Gallery for 1.5 million – it’s reported to be worth 40 million today! Go figure eh?
LikeLike
cool photo and I really enjoyed the comments here Norm! such fun post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
I like modern art which has some kind of symbolism found in it. This doesn’t look like anything but a banner or flag hung “wrong.”
My brother is an artist and when the Impresionist’s painted, he explained l to me, there are subjects given “impressions” of. . . 🙂
This one NOT so much.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Funny you mentioned it, I read that when they first brought this one in the National Gallery didn’t realize that they had it hanging upside down for quite a while 😛
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not a fan of modern art. I went to Tate Modern in London and I left totally confused. I was really trying to figure out how what I had just seen was art. Fortunately, everyone is different and we can celebrate those differences even if we don’t understand them. Awesome post!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks Jade. I think your comment sums it up quite succinctly.
There was a kind lady at the gallery who explained to me that because of the size and scale of this piece (18 feet tall) it is meant to be viewed up close. You’re supposed to stare blankly into the red until your brain starts playing tricks and it starts flickering or rippling around the edges like fire.
I stood there for almost 10 minutes – it never happened for me 😦
LikeLiked by 3 people
Judy said it politically correct. No it is not art…Okay I’m not politically correct. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well then it’s a piece of “not art” that most art experts estimate is worth $40 million.
Don’t worry, I don’t understand it either. But it sure makes for interesting discussions 🙂
LikeLike
Art is so completely subjective, isn’t it? I always find it fascinating when people say, “I could do that myself”. And I think, ok, then do it. And they do not. Because most of the time the actual “vision” or “inspiration” is the seed of “art”. It’s very easy to be negative and dismissive. Much, much harder to keep quite and simply create.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree this is art. I also agree I could do it myself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, especially in a world where everything has been seen or done before so many times that it’s hard to come up with new original ideas. I guess it’s the seed or idea that I couldn’t wrap my head around in this case.
LikeLike
To me, art requires a degree of skill or proficiency and also needs you to go “wow, that’s awesome” when you look at it. These pieces? I think not…..
I was at a similar art gallery last week, did you see my post? https://georgiemoon2016.wordpress.com/2016/04/18/modern-art-do-you-love-it-or-hate-it/
LikeLiked by 2 people
I hadn’t seen your post – thanks for that. We have similar tastes in art then 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually I think I like the floor.
LikeLiked by 3 people
It caught my eye too 😀
LikeLike
I love the man caught in a “sculpture” as a shish kebab – you captured a moment LOL. That is art but the painting isn’t.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I tend to agree but many in the art community have this thing valued at $40 Million – go figure :-\
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Art” is in the eye of the beholder. My eye sees three rectangles of two colors. But, that is why art museums of full of different types of paintings – something for everyone. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I try to keep an open mind and say to myself that maybe I just don’t get it. The National Gallery paid 1.5 million for this in the 70’s and now have it insured for over 40 million. And so I say again: I just don’t get it, but obviously some others do 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person